Impressionism vs. Barbizon

In Madrid, I also saw ‘Impressionism and Open-Air Painting, From Corot to Van Gogh’, on the last day of the exhibition, at the Thyssen museum. The title of the exhibition (‘Impressionism…’) aimed to attract the crowds but its subheading indicated the show would span from the Barbizon school to post-Impressionism. The exhibition was exceptional, and was made up from the Thyssen permanent collection and loans from mostly minor museums.

The exhibition made me wonder if the key difference between the Barbizon school and Impressionism was in the detail in depicting nature, such as tree leaves, moss, and rocks. I believe Impressionists focused on the effects of the light filtering through the tree leaves rather than the leaves themselves, unlike Barbizon painters. For instance, Monet’s The Bodmer Oak (from the Met) has light paint touches, less detailed trees but renders the light effects from the trees. I think Corot may be in between.


The Thyssen museum chose an unusual thematic display, grouping paintings by nature elements that were dear to open air painters. So there was a room for rocks, one for trees, even for clouds. I was myself fascinated by clouds on my London-Madrid flight – art is everywhere! The Thyssen ‘Impressionism and Open-Air Painting’ exhibition has closed now; I am now looking forward to see the Pissarro exhibition, which just opened.


One response to “Impressionism vs. Barbizon

  1. Pingback: Impressionism [The art history series]  | La Fée Culturelle·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s